Quantcast
Channel: CAPRA | Probabilistic Risk Assessment Platform
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 83
↧

Evaluation Questionaire: sonamouchu-CAPRA Technical Assistance Project on Seismic Risk and CAPRA Training in Thimphu, Bhutan

December 6, 2012, 6:21 pm
$
0
0
1. What was your main reason for taking this training?: 
For professional interest and growth
Using the scale on the right, please rate each question/statement below.
Not AllVery Much
2. To what extent did the training fulfill your learning needs?: 
4
3. To what extent did the training achieve its announced objectives: 
4
Using the scale on the right, please rate each question/statement below.
4. How would you rate the training content or subject matter?: 
5
5. How would you rate the order in which the content was presented?: 
5
6. How would you rate the materials used during the training: 
4
Using the scale on the right, please rate each question/statement below.
7. How would you rate the overall quality of the training: 
5
8. How would you rate the overall usefulness of the training: 
4
9. How would you rate the relevance of this training to your institution mission?: 
5
How much do you agree with the following statements?
10. My knowledge/skills increased as a result of this training.: 
4
11. The knowledge/skills gained through this training are directly applicable to my job.: 
4
12. To assess how balanced the training was, please rate each aspect below with respect to quantity.
a. Attention to theoretical content: 
d
b. Attention to practical content: 
c
c. Time for instructors’ presentations: 
c
d. Time for your participation: 
c
e. Pace of the training: 
d
13. What knowledge/skills acquired from the training will you now apply on the job?: 
using CAPRA GIS as antan risk assessment tool.
creating hazard AME files in context of Bhu
14. What type of support would you need to apply the newly acquired knowledge/skills: 
support in the form of technical assistance while executing the work in the context of Bhutan would be highly appreciated.
15. What worked best in this training: 
The hands on exercises.
16. What would you recommend to improve this training in the future?: 
The duration should be longer.
Instructor 1
Nombre: 
Eduardo Reinoso
a. Knowledge of the subject: 
6
b. Quality of deliver: 
5
c. Effectiveness in encouraging participation: 
5
d. Effectiveness in answering participant questions: 
7
e. Effectiveness in making you feel ready to apply the content: 
4
Instructor 2
Nombre: 
Mauro Nino
a. Knowledge of the subject: 
6
b. Quality of deliver: 
4
c. Effectiveness in encouraging participation: 
4
d. Effectiveness in answering participant questions: 
5
e. Effectiveness in making you feel ready to apply the content: 
4
Instructor 3
Nombre: 
Carlos Avelar
a. Knowledge of the subject: 
5
b. Quality of deliver: 
5
c. Effectiveness in encouraging participation: 
4
d. Effectiveness in answering participant questions: 
5
e. Effectiveness in making you feel ready to apply the content: 
5
↧
Search
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 83
Search